The Right Side of San Francisco

Tag: San Francisco

Biden’s Anti-American Memorial Day Speech

The progressive push to redefine American ideals

The most pernicious aspect of the American Progressive project is the sly rewriting of the American tradition to the Progressive vision of society. The Marxist revisionist history of the 1619 Project and the intentional weakening and politicization of our military undermine our country too, but these attempts are overt. 

The ahistorical claims of the 1619 Projects can be refuted, the left wing cultural movement ridiculed, and Marxism outright banned in the case of Critical Race Theory. These Progressive ideas are identifiable and open to debate.

The Progressives use a different method to rewrite American ideals. Language is manipulated, ideals are perverted, and this process happens, subtly, sandwiched between appeals to patriotism and platitudes like “Democracy is the soul of America”. Biden’s somnolent speech on Memorial Day is a classic example.

Biden delivered the quintessential Progressive line when he declared that,

“We were built on an idea, the idea of liberty. An opportunity for all. We’ve never fully realized that aspiration of our founding, but every generation has opened the door a little wider to be more inclusive”. 

Biden deliberately conflates liberty with equity. Liberty is the freedom from government to practice our own pursuits. Liberty does not guarantee an opportunity for all. Nor did the founders believe that “opportunity for all” was a right.

The founders knew, as all adults do, that there will never be an equal opportunity for all. As much as we all wish there was. I wish I could have been an NBA superstar. Yet, even if I worked harder than Jordan there was never an opportunity for me to become one.

Progressives have redefined liberty to equity in order to suggest that America must be transformed into a society where there is equal opportunity for all. Not to mention equal outcomes for all.

Given that neither of these goals can be accomplished, it is imperative that the federal government expand in power and influence. Then the bureaucrats can fiddle with this or that and eventually everyone will be equal in their misery.

Biden finishes the quote with the notion that,  “every generation has opened the door a little wider to be more inclusive”.

The idea is that we are on a steady march of progress towards an unknowable, but obviously attainable, future goal. This of course presupposes that society has a preset direction and an end goal that we are progressing towards. 

This end goal is the loosely defined idea of inclusivity.

Inclusivity, in the modern political sense, is a fiction. Inclusivity requires exclusivity.  In order to “include” trans ideology, Christian or just common sense thinking must be excluded.

Substantively, aiming for inclusivity is stupid. Felons and illegal immigrants should be excluded from our voting process. Men should be excluded from women’s sports.

Inclusivity is not a virtue. Nobody wants to be part of a club that endeavors to be completely inclusive. People want to be part of the exclusive club.

As Biden labored on, one breathy bromide at a time, he continued to wrap his progressive agenda in stars and stripes, “…It’s a mission handed down, generation to generation, the work of perfecting our union”.

Biden urges us to engage in a collective mission to create an inclusive utopia. He implores us to perfect this systematically flawed nation.

Clever. Such an expansive and urgent societal mission necessitates an all powerful leader or a cabal of leaders to guide the populace toward this abstract goal of perfection. These benevolent overlords are required to ensure that society is progressing in the proper direction. Any dissent towards this collective mission blocks progress and therefore can be disregarded or overridden. 

Biden suggests that it is our duty to embark on this collective mission. He is trying to appeal to our American sense of duty, while reframing what our duty is.

We do have a duty to our country. The duty to respect the liberty of our fellow citizens and to pass on the benefits we inherited to future generations. 

The progressives are reframing our duty as the duty to push forward towards a vague and shifting end goal which never materializes. Just ride the wave of progress and eventually everything will be perfect.

This notion of “perfecting our union” is dangerous. We live in an imperfect world. The idea that society can be perfected rationalized the slaughter of over a hundred million people during the twentieth century.

Furthermore, a perfect world to whom? The idea of the perfect world is subjective. I have a feeling that Biden’s definition of a perfect world is vastly different than mine.

Biden’s speech plodded on. He continued, with the verve of a much older man, to unknowingly pervert Edmund Burke’s “primeval contract” between the dead, the living, and the unborn. 

Burke argued that we owe it to previous generations to preserve the good things they handed down to us.  He contended that cultural institutions which have spanned generations are of the utmost importance. They have survived for a reason and these institutions benefit our current society and will help future generations succeed. Reform therefore ought to be judicious and slow.

Biden conversely asserts, well, meekly states, that “We owe the honored dead a debt we can never fully repay. We owe them our full best efforts to perfect the union for which they died…by sustaining the best of America while honestly confronting all that we must do to make our nation fuller, freer and more just.”

According to Biden our debt to the dead is to “perfect the union” rather than to conserve inherited traditions, customs, and institutions. He insists that rash and rapid change is needed to fundamentally alter society. 

Biden at least acknowledges that we should sustain some of America’s past. Although the devil is in the details or lack thereof.

The “best of America” is defined only by vague terminology like “equality” or “opportunity” or “immigration”. The progressives can never specify a positive aspect of American culture or American tradition because they despise America.

And so we must do all that we can to “make our nation fuller, freer, and more just.”

His declarations are reminiscent of another elderly politician who declared that “the Republic will be reorganized into the first Galactic Empire for a safe and secure society”. Hey, at least the Emperor had charisma.

The Normalization of the Paper Straw

What if I told you that a 9 year-old boy and a sea turtle would shape San Francisco’s restaurant laws?

In 2011 a nine-year-old Vermont boy observed that Americans waste a copious amount of plastic straws. Unable to find accurate statistics on daily straw usage, he used the issue as the basis for his environmental science project.

He conducted the project by telephoning manufacturers and asking them to estimate their straw production per day. The phone surveys yielded an estimated five hundred million plastic straws used per day across the United States. 

500 million plastic straws per day is a staggering figure. It is also inaccurate. The actual number is estimated to be around half of that.

I can’t fault the boy for trying. He showed impressive initiative and drive. Unfortunately, that is not the end of the story.

The exaggerated and inaccurate findings were picked up and expanded upon by an environmental group located in Boulder. The figure was further given an imprimatur of legitimacy when the project was featured on the National Park Service’s website. The statistic was soon disseminated to the general public.

Mainstream News outlets such as the New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, and Wall Street Journal cited the figure.

500 million plastic straws used per day. In the United States alone. Now there was an alarming number which can be easily recalled.

Flash forward to 2015.

A disturbing Youtube video emerged of a sea turtle with a plastic straw lodged deep in its nostril.

A free sea turtle

In the video an environmental activist ham-handedly attempts to pry the straw out of the turtle’s nose with a pair of pliers.

The turtle weakly opens and closes his mouth in pain and jerks his head to avoid the pliers. Blood begins streaming down the turtle’s face and the blood is soon splattered on the walls of the skiff. The straw is finally extracted after eight minutes.

It is a wretched and tragic sight. 

The video was ubiquitous by 2018. The wailing turtle provoked a collective response of disgust towards the human race and anger at the increasing pollution in our oceans. That 500 million plastic straw number was bouncing around too.

Now the board was set.

An emotional video coupled with an alarming statistic provides the ideal impetus for an incipient environmental movement. Quickly the chatter for reducing plastic straw usage grew louder.

This combined with our San Franciscan desire to be the vanguard of fashionable activist movements primed us to push the plastic straw issue further than any other city or state.

And so the process began whereby “important issues” move from debate to force and then to an acceptance of a “new normal”.

  1. We should probably use less plastic straws 
  2. Restaurants should be persuaded to make plastic straws optional rather than mandatory
  3. Restaurants should be prohibited from providing plastic straws to patrons unless requested by the customer
  4. Paper straws are a good alternative to plastic straws
  5. Restaurants should offer the option of paper or plastic straws
  6. Restaurants should probably just use paper straws
  7. Restaurants should not be allowed to use plastic straws
  8. There needs to be a law banning plastic straws. 
  9. Plastic straws are now banned
  10. Oh, Paper straws are a little annoying? C’mon you guys are saving the planet, so it’s for the greater good
  11. See paper straws aren’t all that bad?

The tendency to succumb to moral panics and fall into this process over and over again (hello ‘slow streets’) stems from an honorable urge to effectuate positive change.

Humans have a natural desire to be part of a movement bigger than themselves and this can lead to impulsive and unreasonable actions meant to solve geopolitical issues.

We tend to distill complex global issues into simple solutions. And we are often unwilling to accept that some things remain out of our control.

This fundamentally human impulse to help our communities should be controlled, but not disparaged. Plastic pollution in the ocean is an important issue. It is good that people care about the issue.

However, the straw fiasco reminds us to be cognizant of our tendency to slip into romantic notions.  There is a need to exercise prudence when addressing complex global problems and to always weigh the costs and benefits of government action.

In this case banning plastic straws is ludicrous from a cost-benefit perspective.

A reduction in plastic straws could make a tiny dent in the ocean’s pollution problem, but plastic straw usage in the United States is not a serious environmental threat. Ninety percent of plastic waste reaches the ocean through just ten rivers. Eight of those rivers are in Asia and two of the rivers are in Africa. 

The only significant threat the United States poses to the issue of plastic in the ocean is when we “recycle” our plastic. The plastic is transported to Asia and a portion of that waste ends up in the ocean.  

So I sit here, annoyed at this soggy, useless mess of a straw that keeps trapping tapioca balls, but also somewhat hopeful as I’m reminded of our human inclination to care, however misplaced that care can be.

Columbus vs the Indigenous Peoples’: A Debate We Never Had

Christopher Columbus deserves his day back in San Francisco

The 20 year process of renaming San Francisco’s Columbus Day to Indigenous Peoples’ Day culminated in 2018 when the city council made the name change official. Activists cheered and socialites clinked their glasses while most San Franciscans nodded along in acknowledgement that it was the right thing to do.

Nobody stopped to ask: Who are these Indigenous People and why is it so important to celebrate them instead of Christopher Columbus?

Continue reading

Will San Franciscans ever take off their masks?

Covid mania needs to end

I was committing my daily act of blasphemy when I noticed a change.

People maintained eye contact and walked with confidence. They did not fidget with their masks to ensure a secure fit.

There were a few bewildered looks. Understandable. I was walking maskless outside. Still, most people moseyed on by.

It seems the palpable fear which permeated our city is subsiding. 

So, are we done with our collective descent into mass hysteria? Maybe.

Are we finally going to take off these dehumanizing masks?

Continue reading
Follow by Email